Mission statement: On this blog we explore why homeschooling can be a better option for children and families than a traditional classroom setting. We'll also explore homeschooling issues in general, educational thoughts, family issues, and some other random stuff.
Monday, April 16, 2012
Returning back to your regularly scheduled program
Space Access 2012 ended Saturday evening. I'm back home. The normal program of homeschooling, education, family issues and other random stuff will return.
Saturday, April 14, 2012
Reminder - send in a post for the next Carnival of Homeschooling
Please remember to send in a post about homeschooling for the next Carnival of Homeschooling. The Carnival of Homeschooling will be held next week at Home Spun Juggling.
This will be the 329th edition.
Blog Carnvial was repaired for a bit but is now down again, so please send in your submissions directly via email.
Go here for the instructions on sending in a submission.
As always, entries to the Carnival of Homeschooling are due Monday evening at 6:00 PM Pacific Standard Time.
This will be the 329th edition.
Blog Carnvial was repaired for a bit but is now down again, so please send in your submissions directly via email.
Go here for the instructions on sending in a submission.
As always, entries to the Carnival of Homeschooling are due Monday evening at 6:00 PM Pacific Standard Time.
Jim Muncy, PoliSpace
Jim works to influence space policy. Jim recently hired a third staff member.
He will only briefly talk about NASA human space flight. There has been a lot of discussion at NASA about human flight. NASA has started to changed their thinking a bit to allow commercial solutions. Congress recognizes that there are valid commercial options. It looks like NASA might get a cut of about 7% to 8% in the next budget. It would be a huge cut.
Most of what he wants to talk about is the FAA regulation environment. John Rockefeller, a senator, was not happy with a recent extension. His staff told a bunch of people he would not like to move forward on regulation. The current thought is to allow industry to operate with less regulation so they could figure out what works. The industry didn’t evolve as fast as people were hoping. Jim argues that we need a gradual change by the FAA in their regulations. One group in the FAA encouraged the FAA to release all their data so everyone can learn from the data.
Unreasonable Rocket, Paul Breed
His son got married and moved to Seattle, so now Paul is all of Unreasonable Rockets.
Paul started out saying everyone else gives presentations (at Space Access) but he likes to do Show and Tell.
Paul listed the projects he worked on. Paul lost sixty pounds. He has a small 3D printed rocket. He showed a number of objects he has developed. He built a tank. He made progress with sample resin. He bought a 55 gallon drum and had trouble with the resin. The resin company has stopped talking with him.
Lessons on recovery. For testing recovery is very beneficial. He said that less than 25% of the liquid rocket flights have recovery. He spent a couple months trying to understand recovery better.
His long range plans is to combine his three projects and win the NASA Nanosat challenge. Long, long term he would like to create a nanosat business.
Michael Clive, "The Mojave Makers Hackerspace"
He talked about the Maker Movement. People build a ton of stuff. A hackerspace is where people build stuff. People share and teach what people are interested in and what to do. Hackerspace tend to be non-profit. There is a wide variety of events. People share what they learn. Michael was pretty excited about Makers.
Mojave Makers has people from many of the rocket companies at Mojave. They got a building, building 82. They cleaned up the building some. He showed some pictures of the building and the tools they have.
They can help people. They could use power, tools, money and people.
Osa Fitch, "The Rocket Test Company: 2012 Update"
Last year they gave a presentation on a concept. Luna City Enterprises will help customers test their products on a rocket. In the last year they have tested three different nozzle designs. He showed some of their test results.
They can also make things. They have a milling machine.
Their future plans are to develop a 1000 Newton class thrust. It will be regneratively cooled.
And he also made the pitch to go to Wyoming.
Frontier Astronautics, Timothy Bendel
Can drive a truck right into the silo. They are interested in a variety of areas. Stone Aerospace signed a contract with Frontier to help develop a device to go into the liquids of Europa.
They have access to a large laser welder.
They have worked on a flight control system.
He showed their rocket testing environment, the flame trench. They have a crane for lifting a rocket for testing.
The University of Colorado is doing some testing at the facilities. He showed a video.
He talked about Hydrogen Peroxide. Someone is producing Hydrogen Peroxide at the facility. He says hydrogen peroxide is non-toxic and water-soluble.
They are working with Darma, a group which has moved from South Korea.
He put a pled for Angel Investors to help with Darma. They want just one million dollar investment.
He talked about some of the benefits of working in Wyoming. He showed how expensive it is operate in California.
They are applying to have a spaceport in Wyoming. It would be a privately held spaceport.
Speedup, Robert Steinke
He has been testing Laramie Rose, his lunar lander. He has been working on the altitude control. He has struggled with the position. He showed a video. They do testing inside the Frontier Astronautics missile silo. He said it was great for winter testing. The vehicle is physically capable of the landing.
They did some testing to see if injecting cold water into decomposed 80% peroxide increased thrust. The thought was the added mass might contribute, but the heat was soaked up by heating up the water.
He has developed a valve actuator. He is selling it for $500. He can machine the parts to match physical needs. He would like to make a double acting or spring return version of the value. Hasn’t been able to find a solenoid rated for 3000 psi for less than $1000 each.
Gerry Nordley on Tethers Unlimited
Gerry reviewed some of the goals of Tethers Unlimited (TUI), and some of their products.
They still want to do momentum exchange tethers, someday.
They have grown from six to eighteen employees. They have an opening.
TUI has over a million dollars of active contracts.
I found a video by TUI:
Rand Simberg on a Space Property Rights initiative
Rand is proposing property rights for space. Property rights are key to economic development. It allows investment without fear of arbitrary confiscation. As a reminder 2012 is 150th anniversary of the homesteading act of 1862. The Homestead Act allowed people to claim 160 acres. They had to farm and live on it for five years to gain title.
We haven’t treated space as a frontier. Entered space during the Cold War. Claimed space was for all mankind. The Antarctic Treaty which had no declarations of national sovereignty. The goal was to end expensive space race. (Rand said it worked.) They space treaty did not outlaw private property off planet.
Rand proposes that the United States Government recognizes a claim on the moon by a non-government entity under certain conditions. The entity is not necessarily American and the claim will not necessarily be physically defended by the United States Government.
The conditions: Must permanently occupy the territory. He is proposing people could get 4% of the moon, or 6.5% of Mars. A claim might be worth $15 billion.
You can find more details on Homesteading the Final Frontier.
FAA AST, Mike Kelly, Chief Engineer
The title of his talk was “Commercial Human Spaceflight: the Coming Safety Challenge.” Michael is the Chief Engineer at the Office of Commercial Space Transportation of the FAA. He listed some administration changes in the FAA.
The FAA learning cycle for aviation was largely driven by responding accidents, in trying to understand what happened that caused people to die. Michael asserted that rocket flight started thousands of years ago as a means of delivering weapons. In 1960s we started delivering people. Safety was a responsibility of the launch site. In the past the safety of the crew and public has been a battle between several organizations. Michael proposed the question can a single organization hold both in mind?
There has been about 6,000 space launches by major space powers, without a single human casualty in the uninvolved public. (Ignoring some problems with China.) The risk of experimental aviation to the uninvolved public started off low and grew over time. The public grew used to it.
There was a discussion of a flight termination process. Under some situations some people are arguing for the ability to blow up a rocket.
There was a discussion of a flight termination process. Under some situations some people are arguing for the ability to blow up a rocket.
Friday, April 13, 2012
Armadillo Aerospace, Ben Brockert
He had a sixteen minute video. He showed some explosions and explained what went wrong. One of the flights went 42km! The first parachute was blown apart and didn’t slow the rocket enough and the second parachute also didn’t work. Their window tunnel is driving a pickup at sixty miles an hour. Next launch went to 95km. They are launching rockets at White Sands in Texas, which is near where the site where the government tracks satellites. For this way the first parachute was yanked completely off.
Panel: Newspace Lessons Learned - Gary Hudson, Henry Spencer, Henry Vanderbilt
Henry S. – when setting up a regulatory time bomb, be careful about the length of the fuse
Henry V. – everything always takes longer than you plan for. Have lots of backup plans.
Gary – He said best to avoid investors. When he took money from investors he lost money. When he tried to bootstrap up using customer’s money he made money.
Henry V. – you can’t have too much data. Cameras are cheap.
Henry S. – when gathering data it is good to have the time sequence nailed down. When debugging a problem know the sequence of events can be key.
Phil Chapman, "Reviving Human Spaceflight"
Phil Chapman started off talking about how fifty years after the first airplane flight there were tons of airplanes, but fifty years after launching the first satellite there is very little happening in terms of people traveling to space. He pointed out there have been a few times in history when the mindset of mankind changed. One was when Copernicus pointed out that the Earth rotated around the sun. Another was in the 1920s as we started to realize our solar system was just one in a galaxy of stars, and there were something like 10 the 12 number of galaxies. Recently we have learned there are maybe hundreds of billions of planets in our galaxy. We need to get out to the rest of the universe.
Phil expects than in 400 years more humans may live off earth than on earth. It sounds like a startling claim, but consider that since the founding of Plymouth colony America has grown to five times that of United Kingdoms. He would like the United States to consider have a branch of the Air Force which was a Space Guard.
There will be a huge growth in the demand for electricity over the next couple decades. A solar collector in orbit could be a competitive option for providing power. Phil believes that for reasons of national security we need to invest in solar powered satellites. He listed eleven ways solar powered satellites could be used in defensive ways.
Rick Tumlinson, on the EarthLight Institute
He reminded us that most of us are into the Space industry not because of a desire to make money but to be part of something epic.
His organization EarthLight is to carry the light of life to dead planets. They are trying to create a vision which motivates and is credible.
His organization EarthLight is to carry the light of life to dead planets. They are trying to create a vision which motivates and is credible.
Masten Space, Dave Masten
Dave showed a picture of their current rocket. It is designed to fly to 100,000 feet. They have had problem with landing. They have done 88 tether flights in trying to understand the landing issues. They are flying free now.
They have developed a product they call Sensei. It watched the software which is controlling the rocket. If the other product makes a mistake Sensei takes over.
Masten Space is working on a couple business lines. The first is high altitude rocket. The second is on landing.
He showed a picture of Zeus. It is based on an idea of landing a rocket on landing on its side.
It was a short presentation and then he took Q&A.
They have a couple buildings at Mojave. One of the buildings is called The Stable, because that is where they keep the centaur.
Orbital Outfitters, Jeff Feige
They make space suites. They are providing a service and are betting that New Space will be successful. They were founded in 2006. They have several customers, including: NASA, XCOR and SpaceX.
What does the suit need to do? For example: Hold pressure, but what pressure. Or allow movement under pressure, but how much is really “enough”? What does it mean to integrate with the vehicle? They work with each customer and each customer has a different set of answers.
Jeff encouraged people not to wait until the last minute. There is no one suite which fits all rockets.
Soyuz 11 had trouble in 1971. The crew might have survived if they had suites. It is good if the suite allows mobility.
They also build whole vehicle mockups.
They have recently acquired an enormous mill and are looking for jobs to keep it busy.
Jordin Kare on Recent Laser Propulsion Work
They are proposing a whole bunch of lasers on the ground which beams to a flat plate, heats up the fuel and the rocket exhausts providing push. The current plan is to have one set of lasers to get the vehicle off the ground and a larger batch of lasers to provide the energy as the rocket flies over the main bank of lasers.
Jordin was part of a study on using lasers and/or microwave to power a launch. The group was composed of Myrabo, Kare and Parkin. Each of them has different thoughts and the one group ended up with three different results. Kare’s version had payload of 60kg and a total mass to orbit of 1000kg. He talked about the problem of NASA engineers implementing some of his ideas. Kare was expecting a long thin rocket, the NASA group pushed for more short and fat.
Kare said that there is a commercial product which does what he needs. IPG sells a 10 kW single mode at $130 a Watt, but this is because they have only done small orders. If could order in volume the price would drop to at least to $20 a watt. NASA said his machine should cost about $10,000 a kilogram to build, but most rockets only cost around $2000 to $5000 a kilogram.
I think the study is available here. Be warned, the report is almost 700 pages and takes about 90 Megabytes of space.
The study concluded that this is possible. People asked why. Jordin believes there is a market for putting small amounts of material a thousand times or more a year has value. He walked through some of the economics and technology.
Kare's proposal is to use lasers to basically build an assembly line to launch stuff into space very frequently.
Lasermotive, Jordin Kare
Last episode, 2010, they won a NASA power beaming challenge. It was frustrating that the next round of power beaming challenge was canceled. They were able to demonstrate an unlimited-duration flight of a small helicopter with beamed power.
They decided to create a product to generate income. They came up with InvisiTower, a small helicopter rises to 600 feet. It is powered by an optical cable, which is lighter and isn’t affected by lighting storms.
They have gone from LaserMotive, LLC to LaserMotive Inc.
Ben Brockert, "Encouraging STEM Education In The US"
Ben encouraged people to consider setting up more prizes. He asked for suggestions.
Henry Spencer, "Lessons From Smallsats for Small Launchers"
The university Henry works at does have paying customers. With money they have launches on schedule. In some ways they are a company. Most of their satellites are 20cm cubes.
Here are a few lessons they have learned:
Just because the old guard does something a certain way doesn’t mean it is the right way. You can’t trim out items one by one because too often they interact together.
Making things work is hard. Good to get into the hardware soon. Good to get something simple working and then make it complicated. Don’t jump to something complicate. Learn from something basic.
Start with small. Having your first attempt fail is really, really bad for funding. It is more important to have something work that it have a lot of features.
It is really bad to have a failure which you can’t explain.
Cheap and quick is important for developing hardware. The radiation toughed electronics is bad, takes too long. Most of the radiation harden is primitive. The commercial stuff is robust. Commercial chips have more on a single chip than the radiation chips, so need fewer wiring. Henry talked about one satellite which has been in orbit for nine years with commercial parts and it is working just fine.
More important just to get something working; don’t worry about performance. Focus on making it bullet proof.
Good to design out as many death modes as you can. For example they try to make sure that even if the software goes berserk and tries to kill the hardware it wouldn’t be able to hurt the hardware.
Make sure to completely understand each failure. It could be disastrous to encounter a failure and merely put a bandaid over it.
Regulation is a long lead item. Get talking with everyone as soon as possible. For example make sure you have access to radio spectrums.
Here are a few lessons they have learned:
Just because the old guard does something a certain way doesn’t mean it is the right way. You can’t trim out items one by one because too often they interact together.
Making things work is hard. Good to get into the hardware soon. Good to get something simple working and then make it complicated. Don’t jump to something complicate. Learn from something basic.
Start with small. Having your first attempt fail is really, really bad for funding. It is more important to have something work that it have a lot of features.
It is really bad to have a failure which you can’t explain.
Cheap and quick is important for developing hardware. The radiation toughed electronics is bad, takes too long. Most of the radiation harden is primitive. The commercial stuff is robust. Commercial chips have more on a single chip than the radiation chips, so need fewer wiring. Henry talked about one satellite which has been in orbit for nine years with commercial parts and it is working just fine.
More important just to get something working; don’t worry about performance. Focus on making it bullet proof.
Good to design out as many death modes as you can. For example they try to make sure that even if the software goes berserk and tries to kill the hardware it wouldn’t be able to hurt the hardware.
Make sure to completely understand each failure. It could be disastrous to encounter a failure and merely put a bandaid over it.
Regulation is a long lead item. Get talking with everyone as soon as possible. For example make sure you have access to radio spectrums.
Panel: World Space Programs & Prospects - Jeff Foust, Clark Lindsey, Doug Messier, Dave Salt
Clark started off acknowledging that there was a lot of space progress happening outside of the United States. He listed several examples. It seems like there is good progress in general market potential and transportation. There is a need for more infrastructures like space tugs.
Dave talked about the current state of space development in Europe. Governments in Europe have several current orbital systems, plans for future orbital systems and current suborbital systems. There is one commercial orbital system and several suborbital companies. Because of funding issues many governments are looking for new alternatives. The suborbital companies are too immature to judge how viable they will be. There is a lot of interest in Europe. It will help to boast the demand side of New Space development. He expects that governments in Europe will pull back on their investment in
Doug will cover some developments in Russia, China, India and other countries. Recently Russia has a rocket blow up. They have gone four months without blowing up a rocket. Corruption is a big problem. It appears one out of every five rubles is lost to corruption. They are looking at developing a new rocket. There is an effort to build a Silicon Valley outside of Russia. Not clear a government lead effort will be successful. There are several ventures being considered. There is a proposal to sell tickets to the moon.
Japan is working a program. They have a long term plan. It is possible that the United States may have commercial systems developed in time to sell to Japan.
India was looking at 2015 to fly something into space. Now it has been delayed to mid 2020s. They still need improvements in their technology. Indian government has decided to try and develop all their technology on their own.
China seems to be following a similar pattern as Russia. They are looking at a trip to the moon.
The Middle East is largely funding Virgin Galactic. There is a lot of interest outside of the United States, and money.
If there is success in the United States it will probably spur more effort and development around the world.
Jeff thinks spaceflight will no longer be just a government venture. We have a set of plans for getting into space. But we have had plans before. NASA’s budget may get cut, and what affect does that have on the space program. Many other nations have leaned on the United States; if we pull back they may pull back. This could be compounded by the hard economic times. India would like to get to Mars before China, but they have challenges. China has said they plan to be in space. Jeff doesn’t believe space is a major priority for China. Overall expect a decline of government investment in space over the next couple decades.
Jeff asks how could we change this? How increase the benefits? How decrease the cost?
Dave said European and Russian are feeling threaten by SpaceX.
Dave talked about the current state of space development in Europe. Governments in Europe have several current orbital systems, plans for future orbital systems and current suborbital systems. There is one commercial orbital system and several suborbital companies. Because of funding issues many governments are looking for new alternatives. The suborbital companies are too immature to judge how viable they will be. There is a lot of interest in Europe. It will help to boast the demand side of New Space development. He expects that governments in Europe will pull back on their investment in
Doug will cover some developments in Russia, China, India and other countries. Recently Russia has a rocket blow up. They have gone four months without blowing up a rocket. Corruption is a big problem. It appears one out of every five rubles is lost to corruption. They are looking at developing a new rocket. There is an effort to build a Silicon Valley outside of Russia. Not clear a government lead effort will be successful. There are several ventures being considered. There is a proposal to sell tickets to the moon.
Japan is working a program. They have a long term plan. It is possible that the United States may have commercial systems developed in time to sell to Japan.
India was looking at 2015 to fly something into space. Now it has been delayed to mid 2020s. They still need improvements in their technology. Indian government has decided to try and develop all their technology on their own.
China seems to be following a similar pattern as Russia. They are looking at a trip to the moon.
The Middle East is largely funding Virgin Galactic. There is a lot of interest outside of the United States, and money.
If there is success in the United States it will probably spur more effort and development around the world.
Jeff thinks spaceflight will no longer be just a government venture. We have a set of plans for getting into space. But we have had plans before. NASA’s budget may get cut, and what affect does that have on the space program. Many other nations have leaned on the United States; if we pull back they may pull back. This could be compounded by the hard economic times. India would like to get to Mars before China, but they have challenges. China has said they plan to be in space. Jeff doesn’t believe space is a major priority for China. Overall expect a decline of government investment in space over the next couple decades.
Jeff asks how could we change this? How increase the benefits? How decrease the cost?
Dave said European and Russian are feeling threaten by SpaceX.
United Launch Alliance, Frank Zegler
Frank opened with a joke. He said United Launch Alliance (ULA) is considered one of the dinosaurs, but they seem themselves more as a raptor than a typical slow moving dinosaur.
He talked about their goals, and the focus on safety. He showed how the pieces fit together. They are trying to cut costs by designing in reliability. They are looking at simple, commercial designs and materials. They are moving away from hazard materials. They are trying to use waste gas as part of the propellant. The rocket uses just 700 watts for their electrical work. They plan to try and leverage work done by other companies in similar fields. He showed several parts they have developed or buy.
He went into a lot of technical details. He talked about the electrical system.
They feel like they have made good progress.
He talked about their goals, and the focus on safety. He showed how the pieces fit together. They are trying to cut costs by designing in reliability. They are looking at simple, commercial designs and materials. They are moving away from hazard materials. They are trying to use waste gas as part of the propellant. The rocket uses just 700 watts for their electrical work. They plan to try and leverage work done by other companies in similar fields. He showed several parts they have developed or buy.
He went into a lot of technical details. He talked about the electrical system.
They feel like they have made good progress.
XCOR Aerospace, Mark Street
Mark started by giving a little history of XCOR. It was founded by four engineers. The company is now up to 35 They wanted to get into space, and felt they were too poor to go into space at the current costs. They are trying to bring the cost down. Back in 1999 they focused on building engines. He showed a video of their largest engine which had 7000 pounds of thrust. In the twelve years XCOR has been in business they have built eleven engines from scratch.
He talked about how they designed a rocket to be serviced quickly, At the end of the program they could service the rocket seven times in a day.
Their current project is a Lynx. It has been designed from scratch. The plan is to take a pilot and passenger up to 100km.
They have a current contract with United Launch Alliance, ULA. They are working on a 20,000 pounds thrust engine. He talked about another project.
Most of their focus has been on the Lynx. Their production will be capable of Mach 4. They have down a lot of work with wind tunnels. They really like window tunnels. You can create a model, test something out, make changes and test again. All total they have done about eight weeks of testing in wind tunnels. Four of those weeks have been done in the last eight months. They recently found some tweaks to improve yaw and pitch.
Lynx is primarily a carbon fiber structure. He showed the insides of the Lynx and then showed how far along the parts are in terms of delivered, under construction, out for quote and still under detailed design. Mark showed a picture of their work space with parts scattered around.
Their goal is to have something flying by the end of the year.
Mark showed a video. I think it was this video:
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Garvey Space, John Garvey
John is founder of Garvey Spacecraft Corporation. They are focused on nano-satellites. These small satellites are typically up for a short amount of time, but long enough for people to run some simple experiments in space. Garvey Spacecraft has done a total of 29 flights, with four in 2011. They are looking at putting something like 20km for $1 million to $2 million per flight.
John listed some of the milestones they’ve reached in 2011. He gave the details of the four flights they did. They make a lot of use of college students.
John listed some of the milestones they’ve reached in 2011. He gave the details of the four flights they did. They make a lot of use of college students.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)